Trouble for Google they follow one another and this time Italy has decided to fine it decisively with a really not indifferent figure. After shedding light on the amount of data that Android sends to servers in comparison to Apple, here comes a new "sting" for the Mountain View giant. This time around the spotlight would be the dominance policies of the tech giant which, as is often said, take advantage of its power and monopolize the market. But let's go see more details.
Google is fined by Italy for 102 million euros: the reason would be behind an "abuse of power" or rather abuse of a dominant position
As reported by Reuters (link in source), the Italian supervisor would have fined Google for 102 million. The reason, as we read, is abuse of his dominant position because of its Android mobile operating system and Google Play Store app store. The regulator, in the press release, stated:
Through the Android operating system and the Google Play app store, the Google search engine holds a dominant position that allows it to control the access of app developers to end users.
The regulator claimed that Google did not allow JuicePass, an electric vehicle service app from Enel X, di operate on Android Auto (which allows you to use apps while driving) unfairly restricting their use e favoring Google Maps. The company hasn't authorized the app on Android Auto for two years, which could compromise Enel X's ability to build a user base. The antitrust said:
The contested conduct may influence the development of electric mobility at a crucial stage ... with possible negative effects on the spread of electric vehicles
Below is the explanation of Google:
Android Auto's number one priority is ensuring that apps can be used safely while driving. This is why we have strict guidelines on the types of apps supported, based on the regulatory standards of the sector and tests on distraction at the wheel. There are thousands of applications compatible with Android Auto and our goal is to allow even more developers to make their apps available over time. We respectfully disagree with the decision of the Agcm, we will examine the documentation and evaluate the next steps ».
Cover image | Reuters
