It has now been three months sincerelease (in Italy) of vivo X60 Pro. And with a lot of delay compared to what we expected, DxOMark has decided to release his photographic review of the device today. It is no secret that the Chinese brand focuses a lot on photo gallery and there is justification for this collaboration with Zeiss. But for the more experienced, how will the latest flagship of the Chinese company behave? Let's go see it together.
Topics of this article:
vivo X60 Pro is in the upper ranking of Premium smartphones for DxOMark: it beats with Xiaomi Mi 11 and Pixel 5!
With an overall score of 120, Vivo X60 Pro (the one with Snapdragon processor, therefore Global, and not the one with Exynos, or Chinese) is guaranteed one position in the higher ranks of the Premium segment. This, remember, includes devices priced between $ 600 and $ 799. We can expect global image quality similar to that of GooglePixel 5 and Xiaomi Mi 11 (both to 120 points). After all, the vivo smartphone is only a couple of points away from the Apple iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Mini smartphones.
The global version of this device differs from the Exynos version not only in the chipset but also in the photographic specifications: there is a only telephoto lens included in the Snapdragon model versus two telephoto lenses on the model for the Chinese market. Aside from the second telephoto lens, the camera is the same as the Exynos version. Co-designed with Zeiss, the main camera is built around a Quad Bayer sensor from 48 megapixel. Both zoom cameras use 13 megapixel.
Here are the pros and cons of this vivo X60 Pro:
Pro
- wide dynamic range in all photos
- good details in all photos
- generally accurate autofocus of photos and videos
- high detail in ultra-wide-angle outdoor photos
- precise exposure of the target in outdoor and indoor videos
- nice color in most of the videos
- well controlled noise in most videos
Cons
- instability of exposure, especially in outdoor photos
- inaccurate exposure and color rendition on dark skin tones in photos
- noise visible in photos in low light conditions
- low detail in most tele photos and in all videos
- limited dynamic range in videos
- white balance instability in videos in low light conditions